The Moral Issues: Questioning About Opinions

For a long time now individuals have been controversial, asking: What is the moral issue? That they are talking about other things, according to some other philosophers like Emmanuelle Kant. He/she says that you shouldn't do the Imperative Action unless it is in a Category, so don't do it (Lecture notes, Nov.5, 2004). This is the moral issue, is the ones that the Author talks about; exceptionally, the censorship and pornography. In this Essay, I will argue the argument that what the Author said. It is sound, and valid, but however, though, I am disagreeing with his conclusion because I do not agree and everyone has his/her experiences which is relevant; and valid. But however, the moral issue is relevince to them in so many ways? We don't know what it is? Especially when he/she is a philosopher, and that is about to "evaluating arguments to determine whether they are sound" (Lecture notes, Nov.5, 2004). This is one question that I will question about in this Essay, and also other things. The many other things that is relevant on this opinion is: perspectives, and "Mill's Harm Principle" (Lectures notes, Nov.5, 2004) and other Topics that I am going to question about in this Essay.

Like the Author says, in Canada we have the right to freedom of expression; the Second Amendment and the Ten Commandments. If no one is hurting you, you do not have the right to suppress him. And in a moral issue, it is very controversial and has to be debated so that "however, this is doubtful, given that consequentialism appears to imply the negation of Premise (2)" (Course Reader, p.17). This is why I do not agree with the Author of the Essay. Because his argument is not very true; only sound. Soundness is when "a valid argument with true premises" (Course Reader, p.4). But if the moral issues are relevant, why do we not know it? This "implies a conclusion" (Lecture Notes, Nov.5, 2004) that God does not exist. For example, if I told my cat that I am going to the store, how would he know that I am really going to go there? He is only a cat, and so it is not relevant in his belief.

However, everyone has their own perspective on his/her opinions, and what he/she beliefs is not true unless Society says so. But what if Society is wrong? It is proved that this is "a community" (American Heritage Dictionary, 1994, p.377). Then the moral issues are not relevant to God, because perception interferes with the soundness if the argument can't be true unless its premises are true and "the conclusion is true" (Course Reader, p.4). Therefore, I agree that the Author is true, but his argument is not sound. His/her argument is very simple and sincere, but it does not pertain. One is only Human (he/she/the person), and in these modern times of today, especially with the Internet, it is very hard to find out an opinion because there are so many.

- Unedited First-year Philosophy essay by Cary-Anne Mathoosolsz

(what the... okay guys, I know you're trying to be all post-modern and stuff, and I don't want to spoil the joke, but Men in Love are supposed to be this really awesome drone-jazz band, according to Craig Fraid, who recommended them to us... they've got Julien Beillard, who's from the Wooden Stars, who were one of the greatest Canadian bands of the '90s and are doing a reunion show at the ÔShoe on the 20th, and Justin Haynes and Nick Fraser, who put out one of last year's best improv records... I mean, come on! ... but OK, this was pretty funny. - irascible ed.)